COMMENT: Government to blame for hefty housing targets '“ but has lack of local scrutiny let residents down?
Following the decision by Arun District Council’s development control committee on Thursday (August 24), the Observer and Gazette have penned some thoughts:
FIVE THINGS WE LEARNED FROM CLIMPING HOMES REJECTION
1. People power can win
Strict planning laws normally rule the roost and councillors are often hamstrung by the views of other organisations.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdResidents regularly voice concerns around traffic and parking, yet rules followed by the highway authority West Sussex County Council often lead to it raising no objection.
If the county council, or other consultees raise no objection, it is extremely difficult for Arun to justify refusal of permission.
Yet in an unlikely boost for Climping villagers, councillors took the bold step of rejecting the plans on highways grounds - despite advice to the contrary. Given the site was included in the latest version of Arun’s local plan, rejection was doubly surprising.
Councillors should be praised for their bold and brave stance.
2. An appeal looms